![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgUtefE5VI5p4El8SRjn3PCIkcnYobgl7NkCme2Smexr2jDIqyIwtaO0awk0w7ylSel41U5Osj5HOUhUvlWEcclZRaulE8IjsSqAr13Zy9oJP-nitrZzaLpF_J_PnAXNojEDCEu/s200/1400718903_768b774bb3_o.jpg)
I have done a quick search on this blog, and I couldn't beleive that I haven't managed yet to point at the
Ares alternative called
Direct 2.0, which I approve off. The Direct 2.0's team have done a excellent job over the years to come-up with documents and even a web
presentation (and an
Orbiter's addon!) to demonstrate and explain why Direct 2.0 is
safer, simpler and sooner than what NASA has been working on. For a quick introduction (and some great contents) check out
The Space Show of
February 17th since it dedicated to it.
Since I'm no
rocket engineer, I can't comment much on their proposal aside from saying that it does appears more sounds and in fact much more logical than Ares I&V. Make you wonder why NASA picked-up what it did ...
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home